Why stop at "there are only two genders?" There are not only two GENDERS. There are only two SEXES!
Substituting "gender" for "sex" is language pollution which is synonymous with thought pollution. And it doesn't work for other expressions involving "sex."
For instance, are farmers who must identify the sex of their livestock now "gendering the chickens" instead of "sexing the chickens?"
Is a sexist now a genderist? Is a sexual pervert now a gender pervert. Of course, we still haul out the "sex" root to apply it in a negative connotation I suppose.
If I directly ask a girl to have sex with me, do I now say, "Will you have gender with me."
NUTS.
Perfect❗️ Ken strikes again 🤣 ...don't know if we shared this issue or not, but I've used 'sexing' for chickens & that 'gender' used to be reserved for grammar ;-)
Cheers!
great stuff Ken