7 Comments
User's avatar
Jerry Clifford Kays's avatar

Thanks for the fullness of meanings, specific and general. I dare not say more because my "schooling" in language was about 74 years ago and I was too lazy to pay attention in English class so I did not learn a thing ... and I am still that lazy, or more. It would be wonderful were I able to get those things right, especially when I am trying to communicate here and other places, probably why my book never took off 30 years ago. :-/

Expand full comment
Ken Hutchins's avatar

We are all lazy to varying degrees. I don't believe that I got more than 10% of the possible value out of my education that was possible had I been serious and focused.

Your book may have failed your expectations for many reasons beyond proper English and valuable creativity. I know what it takes to get a book to have a shot at being a bestseller, and I'm not willing to make what I see as compromises in my messaging.

Recently, a doctor friend who has written and published several books admitted that he found self-published books more interesting than those published by the big publishing houses. He is intimately familiar with what major publishers do in the truncating of his ideas.

Expand full comment
Jerry Clifford Kays's avatar

Thank you ...

Expand full comment
didgeridoo's avatar

'Single World Government' - puts a mild, but definite, emphasis on 'government', to my eyes and ears.

'One world', either way it's written or spoken, mildly, but definitely, emphasizes 'world', for me.

'World' ' is secondary, Government is primary, in the phrase, so 'single' works IMO.

"They" rope-a-dope us with bastardized language & inverted meanings.

They are Masters of Word Magick.

Thank you my friend, appreciate it. šŸ‘āœŒļø

Expand full comment
Daniel Thompson's avatar

I’m looking forward to a one-government world. 😈

Expand full comment
Ken Hutchins's avatar

Ha!... I want a leave-me-alone government.

Expand full comment
didgeridoo's avatar

Crackerjack!

Expand full comment